The principle of "making of class within class" refers to a situation where a larger group is classified, and then a sub-classification is made within that group. Article 14 requires that any such classification must be reasonable, non-arbitrary, and have a rational basis. The Anuj Garg case highlighted the importance of scrutinizing such sub-classifications to prevent discrimination.
Making of class within class is violative of Article-14 of Indian Constitution, was held in which of the case ?
Asked in Junior Legal Officer 2019 · Topic: Fundamental Rights (Landmark Supreme Court Judgments related to Fundamental Rights)
Show answer
Answer: D. Anuj Garg Vs. Hotel Association of India.
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- ‘Backward’ and ‘More backward’ classification is not bad under Article-14 was held by Supreme Court in which of the following case ?
- Which of the following popularly known as 'Bearer Bond' case ?
- "Freedom of speech and expression is indispensable in the case:
- Which of the following is called as 'Case of Hawker's Rights' ?
- Which of the following popularly known as 'Auto Shankar' case ?
- Which of the following statements are correct with regard to recent Supreme Court Judgement on Right to Privacy? (A) Right to Privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty. (B) 10 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered this historic judgement. (C) The judgement was delivered by the Bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar. (D) The Government has argued that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable Fundamental Right. Select the correct answer using the code given below - (1) Only A, C and D (2) Only B and C (3) Only B, C and D (4) A, B, C and D
- In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that the 'Right to Fly the National Flag' is a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(a) ?
- Ques #: 73 which of the following statements are correct as regards to recent supreme court judgement on right to privacy? (a). right to privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of article 21 that protects life and liberty. (b). 10 judges bench of the supreme court delivered this historic judgement. (c). the judgement was delivered by the bench headed by chief justice of india js khehar. (d). the government has argued that the constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable fundamental right. select the correct answer using the codes given below:
