Dr. S.R. Ranganathan's Five Laws of Library Science are foundational principles in librarianship, and the fourth law is "Save the time of the Reader."
According to Dr. S.R. Ranganathan which one from following is the fourth law of Library Science ?
Asked in Librarian Grade II 2019 · Topic: Basics of Computers and Information Technology (Database Management Systems (DBMS) Basics: Concepts, Types of Databases)
Show answer
Answer: B. Books are for use
Read the notes: Basics of Computers and Information Technology →
More Information and Communication Technology questions
- In ER Model constructs, which type of attribute is most suitable to represent the skill(s) of an employee for an organization?
- In Relational Model, which type of constraint does not allow composite and multivalued attributes?
- Consider following two instances of relations X and Y – X Code Item 100 A 200 B 300 B 400 C Y Item Quantity A 5 B 6 C 3 How many total tuples a Cartesian product between the two relations X and Y will produce?
- Consider the following instance of a relation District - District Name Population JA 10 AJ 50 MM 5 Which of the District name will be returned by the following relational algebra expression? ($ \pi_{\text{Name}} (\sigma_{\text{Name}="Aj"} (\text{District}))) - [(\pi_{\text{Name}} (\sigma_{\text{Population}>5}(\text{District}))) \cap (\pi_{\text{Name}} (\sigma_{\text{Name} ="Aj"}(\text{District}))) ]$
- Consider a schema R (A, B, C, D) and functional dependencies A → B, C → D. Then, the decomposition of R into R1 and R2 where R1 (AB) and R2 (CD), is -
- Dependency Preservation A decomposition is dependency preserving if all original functional dependencies can be enforced on the decomposed relations. In this case, $A \rightarrow B$ is preserved in $R_1(AB)$, and $C \rightarrow D$ is preserved in $R_2(CD)$. 2. Lossless Join A decomposition is lossless if the original relation R can be perfectly reconstructed by joining the decomposed relations. A common condition for lossless join decomposition of R into $R_1$ and $R_2$ is that $R_1 \cap R_2$ must contain a superkey for $R_1$ or $R_2$. However, in cases where the dependencies are disjoint and correspond directly to the decomposed relations (as here), the decomposition is typically lossless even if the intersection is empty. The original relation R is effectively the Cartesian product of its projections onto the disjoint attribute sets, which is what $R_1 \bowtie R_2$ would represent in this case. 197. Consider following two instances of relation Student and Faculty with operation on these instances – Student Faculty (a) Student - Faculty (b) (Student ∩ Faculty) U (Faculty ∩ Student) (c) (Student U Faculty) - (Student ∩ Faculty) (d) Student ∩ Faculty Identify the correct option that produces equivalent output -
- ‘View’ in a database is -
- Consider Relations R1 and R2 as given below - R1 (P, Q, R) P Q R p q r k i j m q r d e f R2 (Q, R, S) Q R S q r n i c o q r a q r b e f g The number of tuples in output of R1 ⋈ R2 will be - - Question not attempted
All 1,360 Information and Communication Technology questions →