Choose the case in which the Supreme Court by a majority ruled that Parliament could amend any part of the Constitution of India, but it could not alter or destroy 'The basic structure' of the Constitution.

Asked in WBCS Main Paper 5 2021 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Judicial Review and Basic Structure Doctrine)

1. Minerva Mills Case, 1980
2. Golaknath Case, 1967
3. Keshavananda Bharati Case, 1973
4. A. K. Gopalan Case, 1950

More Indian Polity and Governance questions

• - This doctrine limits the Parliament's constituent power under Article 368. - The Golaknath case (1967) had earlier ruled that Fundamental Rights cannot be amended by Parliament, which was subsequently overruled by Kesavananda Bharati. 170. Judicial Review function of the Supreme Court means the power to
• Identify the incorrect statement regarding Judicial Review in India.
• Under power of Judicial Review, the Supreme Court and High Courts :
• Which one of the following is regarded as the guardian of the Constitution of India?
• The Constitution of India confers the power of judicial review on:
• In 2005, the Supreme Court struck down the Illegal Migration (Determination by Tribunal) Act of 1983 applicable to the state of
• The concept of Judicial Review in India has been taken from the constitution of
• Judicial Review of the 9th Schedule of the Constitution has been made permissible by which of the following case decided by the Supreme Court ?

All 7,823 Indian Polity and Governance questions →