Statement 1 is incorrect. Upanishads, while primarily philosophical texts based on dialogues and discussions, do contain illustrative stories and analogies, which can be considered parables or fables, used to explain complex concepts (e.g., the story of Nachiketa in Katha Upanishad). Statement 2 is correct. The Upanishads are considered part of the later Vedic literature and generally predate the Puranas, which are part of the post-Vedic Smriti literature compiled much later, around the 4th to 16th centuries CE.
Consider the following statements : 1. There are no parables in Upanishads. 2. Upanishads were composed earlier than the Puranas. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Asked in UPSC IAS 2024 · Topic: Ancient Literature and Litterateur (Vedic and Later Vedic Literature (Vedas, Brahmanas, Aranyakas, Upanishads))
More Ancient History of India questions
- According to the saka year, the period between 22 June and 23 July is the month of:
- In which Upanishad is the famous dialogue of Yagyavalkya and Gargi mentioned ?
- "Sarvam Khalvidam Brahma" is quoted in
- Which of the following Brahmana texts is not a Brahmana text of the Samaveda? (1) Tandya Brahmana (2) Shadvinsha Brahmana (3) Adbhuta Brahmana (4) Taittiriya Brahmana
- Which Veda is the source of Hindustani, Carnatic and Sankari School of Music?
- Which of the following does not come under Shruti literature?
- Among the following, which one is NOT a 'Vedang'?
- Among the following, which one is NOT a ‘Vedang’? (a) Kalpa (c) Smriti (b) Nirukta (d) Siksha