Consider the following statements: A High Court requires prior approval of the Governor while making certain rules settling tables of fee to advocates and pleaders practising before district courts calling returns from district courts which include rules for super-intendence of the district courts Which of the above statements is/are correct?

- Article 227(3) provides that rules made by the High Court for regulating practice and proceedings, prescribing forms, and settling fees for subordinate courts require the Governor's approval. Statement 1 (settling fees) is explicitly covered. - Rules made by the High Court under Article 235 for the administrative control of subordinate courts (which would include rules for administrative procedures like calling returns, Statement 2) also require the Governor's approval. - Rules for general superintendence (Statement 3), encompassing both administrative and procedural aspects, also require approval under Article 227 and 235. - All three statements describe types of rules requiring Governor's approval. Since "1, 2 and 3" is not an option, and options B (1 and 2) and D (3) are mutually exclusive and incomplete, there appears to be an error in the question or options. Assuming the question intends to distinguish between specific examples (1 and 2) and the general power (3), and forcing a choice from the provided options, B (1 and 2) might be the intended answer, focusing on specific aspects rather than the broad category, though this is legally contestable.