The Romesh Thaper case is a foundational judgment that significantly interpreted and upheld the freedom of speech and expression, particularly concerning the freedom of the press.
"Freedom of speech and expression is indispensable in the case:
Asked in Junior Legal Officer 2019 · Topic: Fundamental Rights (Landmark Supreme Court Judgments related to Fundamental Rights)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Which of the following is called as 'Case of Hawker's Rights' ?
- Which of the following popularly known as 'Auto Shankar' case ?
- Which of the following statements are correct with regard to recent Supreme Court Judgement on Right to Privacy? (A) Right to Privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty. (B) 10 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered this historic judgement. (C) The judgement was delivered by the Bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar. (D) The Government has argued that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable Fundamental Right. Select the correct answer using the code given below - (1) Only A, C and D (2) Only B and C (3) Only B, C and D (4) A, B, C and D
- In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that the 'Right to Fly the National Flag' is a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(a) ?
- Ques #: 73 which of the following statements are correct as regards to recent supreme court judgement on right to privacy? (a). right to privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of article 21 that protects life and liberty. (b). 10 judges bench of the supreme court delivered this historic judgement. (c). the judgement was delivered by the bench headed by chief justice of india js khehar. (d). the government has argued that the constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable fundamental right. select the correct answer using the codes given below:
- Right to Information is a
- Which one of the following cases relate to anti-strike verdict?
- In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that Article 16(4-A) providing for reservation in promotions is a enabling provision ?