The A.K. Roy vs Union of India case (1982) primarily dealt with the constitutional validity of the National Security Act, 1980, and the scope of judicial review in matters of preventive detention. While it involved constitutional principles and rights, it did not primarily deal with the basic structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution.
Identify the case which did not deal with the basic structure of the Indian Constitution?
Asked in TNPSC CS Prelims 2024 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Judicial Review and Basic Structure Doctrine)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- The power of Judicial Review relates to
- Given below are two statements, one is labelled as Assertion (a) and the other as Reason (R). Assertion (A): The Supreme Court of India has exclusive jurisdiction regarding Constitutional validity of Central laws. Reason (R): The Supreme Court is the Guardian of the Indian Constitution. Select the correct answer from the codes given below: Codes:
- The Supreme Court of India enunciated the doctrine of "Basic Structure of the Constitution" in
- The concept 'Basic Structure of the Constitution' was propounded by the Supreme Court in the case of:
- Consider the following statements regarding Judicial Review: 1. The Constitution of India has explicitly provided for the system of Judicial Review. 2. Judicial Review is a basic feature of the Constitution. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- The constitutional principle of the 'Basic Structure' was invented by the
- In India, Judicial Review implies
- With reference to the Constitution of India, consider the following statements: 1. No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid. 2. An amendment to the Constitution of India cannot be called into question by the Supreme Court of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?