In the Golaknath case (1967), the Supreme Court held that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights.
In which case, Supreme Court held that any Constitutional amendment that takes away or abridges a Fundamental Right conferred by Part III is void?
Asked in WBCS Main Paper 5 2023 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Landmark Judgments and Doctrines)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- In which of the following cases the doctrine against arbitrariness was incorporated into equality before law by Justice Bhagwati?
- "Excessive reservation would be fraud on the Constitution of India" was observed by the Supreme Court in
- When a Court declares certain provisions of an Act invalid, it does not affect the validity of the entire Act, according to
- The doctrine of prospective overruling was first evolved by Justice Subba Rao in
- "What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly". This statement epitomizes the doctrine of
- Which among the following is not a correctly matched pair ? (Case) (Year of Judgement of Supreme Court)
- Who among the following Judges of the Five-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the Aadhaar Scheme and Act case on 26 September, 2018 dissented from the majority verdict?
- In the verdict of which case, the Supreme Court of India has laid down that Secularism is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution? (1) Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 2000 (2) R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India, 1994 (3) S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994 (4) D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, 1983 (5) Question not attempted