This question relates to the judicial interpretation of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution and its importance as established by the Supreme Court in seminal cases.
In which of the following cases did the court state that the Preamble to our Constitution is "not of the common run", as is the Preamble in a legislative enactment, but was marked by a "stamp of deep deliberation and precision"? - (1) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - (2) Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1965) - (3) I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) - (4) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Asked in Protection Officer 2024 · Topic: The Preamble (Preamble as a part of the Constitution (Relevant Supreme Court cases))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- In which of the following judgements, the Supreme Court has said that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution ? - Question not attempted
- In which case the Supreme Court of India originally stated that the Preamble is not an integral part of the Indian Constitution?
- In which case it was decided that the preamble is not a part of the Constitution ?
- The Preamble to the Constitution of India is a part of the Constitution and can be amended by the Parliament. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- In which of the following cases, it was pronounced that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution of India ?
- In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India held that Preamble is NOT a part of Indian Constitution?
- In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India held that Preamble is NOT a part of Indian Constitution ? Keshvanand Bharti Case Berubari Case Sajjan Singh Case Golaknath Case
- In which case, the Supreme Court of India held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution?