While Delhi is the seat of the Supreme Court, the Constitution provides flexibility regarding its sitting places and parliamentary power to enhance its jurisdiction and powers.
The Supreme Court has the autonomy to make rules for its practice and procedure, but these rules are subject to the approval of the President (Article 145(1)). 328. Consider the following statements: 1. The Supreme Court of India can sit only in Delhi. 2. The Supreme Court of India can sit in places other than Delhi which the Chief Justice of India may appoint with the approval of the President. 3. The Parliament may make provisions for conferring supplementary powers upon the Supreme Court. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Asked in GPSC Prelims CSP 1 2024 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Seat of the Supreme Court and Rule-Making Power)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Supreme Court Rules, 2013 replacing the 1966 Rules, have been framed under which Article of the Constitution of India ?
- The Chief Justice of India wants the Supreme Court to sit at a place other than Delhi. For this, he needs -
- Under which of the following Articles of the Constitution of India, "No judgement shall be delivered by the Supreme Court in the open court"? - Question not attempted
- Who makes rules for regulating generally the practice and procedure of the Supreme Court?
- Besides its permanent seat at Delhi, the Supreme Court can also meet at
- The Supreme Court judges sit in
- A writ issued by a court to some inferior authority to transfer the matter to it for its proper consideration is called
- Which among the following writs is issued to quash the order of a Court or Tribunal?