Violating the right to peaceful assembly (1) and causing civilian casualties due to insufficient care or disproportionate force during engagements in civilian areas (3) are human rights violations. Lawful search warrants (2) are not.
Which among the following actions would violate human rights? 1. State forces disrupting peaceful protests. 2. State forces carrying out search warrants in insurgency affected areas. 3. State forces engaging with armed insurgents in civilian areas resulting in loss of civilian lives. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Asked in UPSC CAPF 2010 · Topic: Fundamental Rights (Restrictions on Fundamental Rights (Articles 33, 34))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Barring exceptions, no law providing for preventive detention shall authorize the detention of a person for a period longer than
- Consider the following statements with regard to the Fundamental Rights : 1. The Parliament has power to modify the rights conferred by Part III of the Constitution of India with regard to persons employed in telecommunication systems of certain categories. 2. During the course of enforcement of martial law in any area, restrictions can be imposed on the exercise of the Fundamental Rights. 3. The Fundamental Rights cannot be overridden for implementing any of the Directive Principles of State Policy. Which of the above statements is/are not correct?
- Who among the following has been given the power by the Indian Constitution to 'impose reasonable restrictions' on the fundamental rights?
- A law which arbitrarily or excessively invades the right of a person is
- In reference to Right to freedom for the protection of the interest of Scheduled Tribes the reasonable restriction may be imposed under
- Which one of the following authorities is authorised by the Constitution to impose reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights ?
- In which one of the following cases it has been held that prohibition on sale of eggs within municipal area of Rishikesh is not violative of Article 19(1)g of the Constitution ?
- Assertion [A] : The fundamental rights are not absolute but qualified. Reason [R] : The State may impose reasonable restrictions on them.