The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted on December 10, 1948. India is a signatory to the UDHR and its principles are reflected in the Indian Constitution. The Right to Property is not explicitly listed as a fundamental human right in the current UDHR.
Which of the following regarding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is not correct?
Asked in GS 32 2023 IS DEEO 1505 2024 · Topic: Fundamental Rights (Distinction between Fundamental Rights and Legal Rights / Directive Principles of State Policy)
Show answer
Answer: D. India is not a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Which of the following is not a Fundamental Right guaranteed by the Constitution of India?
- Under which part of our Constitution, the Fundamental Rights fall?
- Under which part of our Constitution, the Fundamental Rights fall? - [a] Part-I - [c] Part- III - [b] Part-II - [d] Part- IV
- What is the ground on which the Supreme Court can refuse relief under Article 32?
- Consider the following statements : 1. Under Part III of the Constitution of India, individuals can enforce rights guaranteed by this Part when they are violated by the action of a government authority. 2. Under Part III of the Constitution of India, individuals can enforce rights guaranteed by this Part when they are violated by not only the action of a government authority, but also by its inaction. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Under the Constitution of India who is the guardian of fundamental rights ?
- With reference to India, consider the following statements : 1. When a prisoner makes out a sufficient case, parole cannot be denied to such prisoner because it becomes a matter of his/ her right. 2. State Governments have their own Prisoners Release on Parole Rules. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Consider the following statements with respect to Article 32 and Article 226 of the Constitution of India : Article 32 confers a right on the petitioner while Article 226 confer a discretion on the High Court. Article 32 and Article 226 confer identical power on the Supreme Court and the High Courts to enforce the Fundamental Rights. The power of superintendence of the Supreme Court over the High Courts is not similar to the powers of superintendence conferred on the High Courts over the courts subordinate to them. Which of the above statements is/are not correct?