Statement C claims that an order made by an Executive Magistrate is not subject to revisional jurisdiction of the High Court. This is incorrect. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the High Court and Sessions Court have revisional powers over the proceedings and orders of any criminal court inferior to them, which includes Executive Magistrates when they function as criminal courts under specific provisions (e.g., Chapter X relating to public order and tranquility). Statements A, B, and D are generally correct or accepted characterizations under the CrPC. Executive Magistrates are appointed by the state government (A is generally correct, though consultation with HC is specifically required for Judicial Magistrates, not explicitly for Executive Magistrates under CrPC, making A potentially problematic, but C is definitively false about revisional jurisdiction). Executive Magistrates are subordinate to the District Magistrate (B is correct). Executive Magistrates perform certain duties that are considered quasi-judicial (D is generally accepted). Given the options, C is the most definitively incorrect statement regarding a legal process.