The Constitution Bench that heard the Sabarimala case comprised Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice R.F. Nariman, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, and Justice Indu Malhotra. The judgment was delivered with a 4:1 majority, allowing women of all ages to enter the temple. Justice Indu Malhotra was the lone dissenter, holding that the issue was one of religious faith and not just gender discrimination, and courts should not interfere in such matters unless they were pernicious or oppressive.
Who was the dissenting Judge in the Apex Court's Sabarimala verdict?
Asked in WBPSC CS Prelims 2019 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Landmark Judgments and Doctrines)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- The Supreme Court of India enunciated the doctrine of ‘Basic Structure of the Constitution’ in
- The status of women in Indian Society is glorified by a judgement of a Court in September, 2003. The Court is
- In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India enunciated the ‘doctrione of basic structure’ ?
- In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India declare the prevalence of Fundamental Rights over Directive Principles of the State Policy in case of conflict between the two ?
- In the case of Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association, which of the following judges upheld the Constitutional Amendment for creation of National Judicial Appointments Council ?
- In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India issued direction on playing national anthem in theatres and cinema halls?
- Which of the following doctrines means “to stand by precedent and not to disturb the settle point of law”?
- In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that, “if a body is an agency or instrumentality of government, it may be an authority under Article 12.”?