- Statement 1 is correct. India has a system of single citizenship for the entire country. While the concept of 'domicile' can be complex and may have regional implications for specific matters, the legal framework primarily recognizes domicile in the country as a whole in the context of citizenship status and fundamental rights. - Statement 2 is incorrect. Article 58 of the Constitution of India lists the qualifications for election as President. It requires the person to be a citizen of India, but it does not specify that the person must be a citizen by birth. A naturalized citizen is also eligible. This requirement exists, for example, for the presidency in the United States, but not in India. - Statement 3 is incorrect. Indian citizenship, once granted to a foreigner through naturalization or registration, can be deprived by the Government of India under specific circumstances mentioned in the Citizenship Act,
With reference to India, consider the following statements : There is only one citizenship and one domicile. A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State. A foreigner once granted the citizenship cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Asked in UPSC IAS 2021 · Topic: The Citizenship (Single Citizenship: Concept and Implications)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- These grounds include acquiring citizenship by fraud, disloyalty to the Constitution, unlawfully trading with an enemy during war, or continuous absence from India for seven years. 58. Which one of the following features of citizenship in India is correct?
- The citizenship provided by the Constitution of India is :
- The concept of single citizenship is adopted in India from the Constitution of which country? - (1) France - (2) Canada - (3) U.K. - (4) U.S.A.
- The constitution of India has introduced single citizenship on the pattern of
- Which of the following Articles in the Constitution of India are exceptions to the Fundamental Rights enumerated in Article 14 and Article 19?
- Under Article 368, the Parliament has no power to repeal Fundamental Rights because these are :
- Which one of the following is NOT a fundamental right anymore ?
- The fundamental rights under Articles 12-35