Consider the following statements in respect of Incremental Model of Policy Formulation: (i) The concept of incrementalism policy formulation is put forwarded by Robert Dahl. (ii) The disjointed policy making depicts policy making as a process of muddling through. (iii) The synoptic model of policy formulation acknowledges man's limited problem solving capacities. (iv) Disjointed incrementalism explains governmental decision making. (v) Logical incrementalism explains strategy formulation in large and complex business organisations. Which of the above statement/s is / are correct ?

- Statement (i) is incorrect: The concept of disjointed incrementalism or "muddling through" is primarily associated with Charles E. Lindblom, not Robert Dahl. Dahl is known for his work on pluralism. - Statement (ii) is correct: Lindblom's "muddling through" metaphor describes disjointed incrementalism, where policy making proceeds through small, limited changes from existing policies rather than comprehensive, rational analysis. - Statement (iii) is incorrect: The synoptic (or rational-comprehensive) model assumes decision-makers have full information and capacity for comprehensive analysis. Incrementalism, in contrast, acknowledges and is built upon the concept of limited human cognitive and information processing capacities in complex policy environments. - Statement (iv) is correct: Disjointed incrementalism is widely used as a descriptive model to explain how policy decisions are often made in governmental bureaucracies and political systems through marginal adjustments and compromises. - Statement (v) is correct: Logical incrementalism, a concept developed by James Brian Quinn, is a strategy formulation model specifically applied to large and complex business organizations, involving purposeful, adaptive, and incremental strategic changes.