- Arguments should be evaluated based on their significance and direct relevance to the question asked. - Arguments related to cost, democratic principles (accountability, representation), and governance effectiveness/stability are typically considered strong in policy debates. - Each argument presented here raises a substantial point of concern or benefit regarding the proposed change in election frequency.
Consider the statement: "Should the Parliamentary Elections in India be held every three years as against five years at present?" and the arguments: I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources. II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay. III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities. Which of the arguments are strong?
Asked in GPSC Prelims CSP 1 2022 · Topic: The Parliament (Lok Sabha: Composition, Duration, Electoral System)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Who among the following was returned unopposed to the first Lok Sabha ?
- The elections to the Lower House of the Parliament of India, held in 2019, constituted the
- Among the following which group of States/ Union Territories have only one seat in the Lok Sabha ?
- Consider the following in relation to the election of the members of the Parliament :
- Which of the following Lok Sabhas were NOT completed their five-year term of existence ?
- How many members of Lok Sabha are elected from Uttarakhand ?
- Who is India's women Parliamentarian to win election for the eight consecutive times from the same Lok Sabha Constituency ?
- Which of the following Lok-Sabha did not complete its full five year term?