The case of Maneka Gandhi established that the 'procedure established by law' under Article 21 is not merely any procedure, but a fair, just, and reasonable procedure, incorporating the principles of natural justice and the concept of due process.
In which case it was specified by the Supreme Court that the concept of natural justice and due process are an essential part of the constitution scheme guaranteeing fundamental rights ?
Asked in Govt. Industrial Training Institute Principal (Grade II) Examination 2023 · Topic: Fundamental Rights (Landmark Supreme Court Judgments related to Fundamental Rights)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- In which of the following case, Supreme Court of India declared the Right of Equality, as a basic feature of the Constitution A) Onkar Lal Bajaj v. Union of India, A.I.R. 2003, S.C. 2562 B) Vishal Properties (P) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. 2007, S.C. 2924 C) Ashutosh Gupta v. State of Rajasthan A.I.R. 2002, S.C. 1533 D) M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, A.I.R. 2007, S.C. 1
- In which of the following case, Supreme Court of India declared the Right of Equality, as a basic feature of the Constitution
- Which of the following may be a violation of fundamental rights?
- The Indian Parliament has the power to modify the rights conferred by Part III of the Constitution of India in their application to __________. 1. The members of the Armed Forces 2. The members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order 3. Persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence 4. But there is no restriction on rights conferred by Part III, while martial law is in force in any area
- Which among the following actions would violate human rights? 1. State forces disrupting peaceful protests. 2. State forces carrying out search warrants in insurgency affected areas. 3. State forces engaging with armed insurgents in civilian areas resulting in loss of civilian lives. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- Barring exceptions, no law providing for preventive detention shall authorize the detention of a person for a period longer than
- Consider the following statements with regard to the Fundamental Rights : 1. The Parliament has power to modify the rights conferred by Part III of the Constitution of India with regard to persons employed in telecommunication systems of certain categories. 2. During the course of enforcement of martial law in any area, restrictions can be imposed on the exercise of the Fundamental Rights. 3. The Fundamental Rights cannot be overridden for implementing any of the Directive Principles of State Policy. Which of the above statements is/are not correct?
- Who among the following has been given the power by the Indian Constitution to 'impose reasonable restrictions' on the fundamental rights?