- The Supreme Court in the Berubari Union case (1960) initially held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. - In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the court reversed its decision and held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and can be amended, provided the basic structure is not altered. - The Bommai case (1994) reaffirmed that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and emphasized its role in understanding the basic structure.
In which of the following cases "the Supreme Court has held that Preamble forms part of ihc Constitution/ ?
Asked in UPPCS Prelims 2012 · Topic: The Preamble (Preamble as a part of the Constitution (Relevant Supreme Court cases))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- In which case the Supreme Court specifically find that Preamble is not a part of the Constitution?
- "Preamble of our Constitution is of extreme importance and the Constitution should be read and interpreted in the light of the grand and noble vision expressed in the Preamble." Justice Sikri expressed the above opinion in the case of
- 'Preamble' is the part of Indian Constitution declared in the case of
- Which of the following statements related to Preamble are incorrect? Identify the correct answer from the code given below- (A) In Sajjan Singh Case, Supreme Court agreed that the Preamble was the key to the minds of the framers of Constitution. (B) In Berubari Case, the Supreme Court said that Preamble had the stamp of "deep deliberation", was "marked by precision" and the framers of the Constitution attached significance to it. (C) In Golak Nath Case, it was observed that the Preamble was the "very soul of the Constitution - eternal and unalterable". (D) In Keshavananda Bharati Case, the Court observed that Preamble was not only very much part of the Constitution, but was of "extreme importance and the Constitution should be read and interpreted in the light of the grand and noble vision expressed in the Preamble". Code - - (5) Question not attempted
- In which of the following cases did the court state that the Preamble to our Constitution is "not of the common run", as is the Preamble in a legislative enactment, but was marked by a "stamp of deep deliberation and precision"? - (1) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - (2) Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1965) - (3) I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) - (4) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
- In which of the following judgements, the Supreme Court has said that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution ? - Question not attempted
- In which case the Supreme Court of India originally stated that the Preamble is not an integral part of the Indian Constitution?
- In which case it was decided that the preamble is not a part of the Constitution ?