(G.K. Group A)-2022 This question concerns the power of Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights and the landmark Supreme Court judgments related to this issue. It specifically refers to the interpretation of Article 13 regarding constitutional amendments.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that Constitutional Amendment is also a law under Article 13 of the Constitution of India, which can be declared void if it is inconsistent with the Fundamental Rights ?
Asked in Sr. Teacher Gr II (Sec. Edu.) Comp. Exam 2022 · Topic: Constitutional Amendments (Limitations on Amending Power: The 'Basic Structure Doctrine' (Genesis, evolution, and major cases like Kesavananda Bharati))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- In which case did the Supreme Court of India concede the right to amend the Constitution of India but denied the right to amend the basic structure of the Constitution?
- Consider the following statements : (i) The Supreme Court has clearly defined the basic structure of the Constitution in the Kesavananda Bharati case. (ii) The limited power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. Which of the statements given above is/ are correct?
- Two statements are given below. One is labelled as Assertion (A) and other is labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): The basic structure doctrine prevents the Parliament from amending certain features of the Indian Constitution. Reason (R): Article 368 explicitly mentions the features that cannot be amended. Choose the correct option from the codes given below.
- Assertion (A): Under Article 368, the Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution. Reason (R): The Parliament is the Supreme Legislative body elected by the people of India. Choose the correct answer using the code given below:
- The President's power to veto a Bill for amendment of the Constitution has been taken away, by substituting the word, "shall give his consent" by which amendment?
- Consider the following statements: A bill amending the Constitution requires a prior recommendation of the President of India. When a Constitution Amendment Bill is presented to the President of India, it is obligatory for the President of India to give his/her assent. A Constitution Amendment Bill must be passed by both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha by a special majority and there is no provision for joint sitting. Which of the statements given above are correct?
- On receipt of a Constitution Amendment Bill, having been passed by both Houses of the Parliament, the President
- Through which Constitutional Amendment Act, the President's assent has been made mandatory on the Constitutional Amendment Bill ? - Question not attempted
