Joint sittings are a mechanism to resolve deadlocks between the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on ordinary bills. They cannot be used for Money Bills or Constitutional Amendment Bills.
Read carefully the following sentences: I. In case of disagreement between both the houses of Indian Parliament there is a provision of joint sitting. II. A joint sitting can be called only on ordinary bills. III. A provision for joint sitting on Constitutional Amendment Bills is also described in Article 102. Which of the statements are correct -
Asked in Sub Inspector Comb. Comp. Exam 2016 · Topic: The Parliament (Legislative Procedure: Types of Bills (Ordinary, Money, Financial, Constitution Amendment) and their passage)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- The Provision of a joint sitting of both the Houses of Parliament is mentioned in the Constitution under the following Article -
- Which of the following actions can be taken by the Rajya Sabha regarding Money Bill?
- Identify the incorrectly matched pair :
- Which one of the following statements is NOT correct in the context of Money Bill?
- With reference to 'Money Bill', consider the following statements : (i) It can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and not in the Rajya Sabha. (ii) A joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament can be convened in case there is a deadlock. (iii) When it is presented to the President of India, it is obligatory for the President of India to give his/her assent. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Which Lok Sabha Election resulted in a Hung Parliament?
- What is the maximum strength of the Lok Sabha provided by the Constitution of India?
- Areawise, which one of the following is the largest Lok Sabha Constituency?