The NHRC has broad powers to investigate human rights violations, including suo motu cognizance and intervention in court proceedings.
The National Human Rights Commission – - can enquire only on the presentation of a petition of the victim and not suo motu into complaint of violation of human rights. - can not intervene in any proceeding involving violation of human rights pending before any court, under any circumstances. Which of the above statement/statements is/are correct ?
Asked in Sub Inspector Comb. Comp. Exam 2021 b 2021 · Topic: Lokpal and Important Commissions (National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Human Rights Commissions (SHRC))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Consider the following statements about the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India : (i) It is a statutory body in India established on 12 October, 1993. (ii) It was established in conformity with the Paris Principles adopted at the first international workshop on national institutions for promotion and protection of human rights held in Paris in October 1991. (iii) The Chairman of the Commission must always be a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court. (iv) The NHRC has powers equivalent to those of a Civil Court. Which of the above statements is/ are correct?
- While enquiring into the complaints under the Human Rights Act 1993, the National Human Rights Commission power equivalent to :
- Section 53 of the Consumer Protection Act of 2019 provides for establishment of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. It is to be known as
- What is the period of limitation to file a complaint before a commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019?
- When the seller manipulates the price, it is known as
- Which one of the following is not correct according to the Consumer Protection Act 2019?
- Malimath Committee was appointed to suggest reforms on which of the following ?
- The members of the Human Rights Commission, are appointed for a period of