- Statement 1: Mischief by fire to destroy a building used as a place of worship. While Section 436 of IPC specifically mentions destruction of a human dwelling or a place for custody of property by fire/ explosive with life imprisonment, Section 438 applies the punishment of Section 436 to mischief by fire or explosive substance intending to cause damage to any property, provided the mischief is punishable under Section 435 (mischief causing damage of Rs. 100 or more, or Rs. 10 or more in case of agricultural produce). Destruction of a building by fire is mischief causing significant damage, falling under Section 435. Section 438 states that whoever commits such mischief by fire/ explosive and commits thereby mischief punishable under section 436, shall be punished with life imprisonment or 10 years + fine. This phrasing is interpreted to mean that if the nature of the mischief (destruction of a building by fire/explosive) is of the degree contemplated by Section 436, the punishment under 436 applies even if the property is not a dwelling or custody place, provided it falls under Section 435. Thus, destroying a place of worship by fire can be punishable with life imprisonment under Section 438 read with Section 436. - Statement 2: Mischief by explosive substance to destroy a human dwelling house. Section 436 of IPC directly covers "mischief by fire or any explosive substance... intending to cause... the destruction of any building which is ordinarily used as a human dwelling". The punishment prescribed is imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for up to ten years, and fine.
The punishment of imprisonment for life can be awarded for which of the following offences? 1. Mischief by fire to destroy a building used as a place of worship 2. Mischief by explosive substance to destroy a human dwelling house Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Asked in UPSC CISF AC EXE 2024 · Topic: The Parliamentary Act (Powers and Functions of Parliament (Legislative, Executive, Financial, Constituent))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- With regard to seizure of property under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, consider the following statements : 1. A police officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police conducting an investigation for identifying unlawfully acquired property can make an order for seizing the property under investigation if he has reason to believe that the property in question may be concealed or transferred in any manner. 2. An order made as above shall have no effect unless the same is confirmed by an order of the court within thirty days of its being made. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A District Magistrate may by warrant authorize a police officer above the rank of a constable to take possession of an objectionable article deposited in any place. These articles include 1. forged documents 2. false seals 3. obscene objects Select the correct answer using the code given below.
- Consider the following statements with regard to search under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 1. A search warrant remains in force until cancelled by the court issuing it or the same is executed. 2. A search warrant cannot be executed at any place if the place concerned falls outside the jurisdiction of the court issuing it. 3. A search warrant may be issued by the District Magistrate for search of a person who has been confined where such confinement amounts to an offence. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Consider the following statements with regard to seizure of property under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 1. Any police officer may seize any property which may be suspected to be stolen. 2. Any police officer may seize any property which may be found under circumstances which create suspicion of the commission of any offence. 3. If the value of the property seized is less than one thousand rupees and the person entitled to its possession is absent, the court may direct its sale by auction forthwith. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- Which one among the following statements is not correct?
- Bribery, under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, includes which of the following? 1. Giving a gratification to any person with the object of inducing him to exercise any electoral right or rewarding any person for having exercised any such right 2. Making of a declaration of public policy or making of a promise of public action 3. Giving or accepting a treat in the form of food, drink or entertainment Select the correct answer using the code given below.
- Which one of the following with regard to the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 is correct?
- Consider the following statements with regard to the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993: 1. It is mandatory to have at least one woman Member in the National Human Rights Commission having the knowledge of, or practical experience in, matters relating to human rights. 2. It is mandatory to have at least three Members in the National Human Rights Commission having the knowledge of, or practical experience in, matters relating to human rights. 3. The Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities is deemed to be a Member of the National Human Rights Commission for certain purposes only. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?