The maximum permissible gap between two sessions of Parliament or a State Legislature is six months.
What is the maximum gap of time between two Sessions of the Parliament and also the State Legislative Assembly respectively?
Asked in APSC CCE Prelims Exam 2014 · Topic: The Parliament (Sessions of Parliament: Summons, Prorogation, Adjournment, Dissolution)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- What is the maximum permissible time gap between two Sessions of the Parliament?
- A sitting of the Parliament can be terminated by adjournment, prorogation or dissolution. In this regard choose the correct answer. Adjournment terminates sitting as well as session of the House. All pending notices including introducing bills lapse on prorogation. Dissolution ends all business including bills and motions before the Lok Sabha. Adjournment sine die means terminating a sitting for an indefinite period.
- Generally how many sessions are there in the Lok Sabha?
- What will be happened if President summons for the joint session of Parliament and in the meantime Lok Sabha dissolved ?
- Which of the following statements regarding sessions of Parliament is incorrect?
- Which of the following statements are correct regarding Prorogation in Parliament? 1. The Prorogation not only terminates a sitting but also a session of the House 2. The prorogation does not affect the Bills or any other business pending before the House 3. The prorogation leads to lapse of all pending notices (other than those for introducing Bills).
- Which of the following statements are correct in respect of 'Sittings of Parliament'? (1) In the year 1955 a Lok Sabha Committee had proposed a time-table for parliamentary sessions with three times a year (2) It suggested Budget Session from February 1, to May 7 (3) It suggested Monsoon Session from July 1 to September 10 (4) It suggested Winter Session from November 15 to December 15
- - Statement 4 is correct. The Committee proposed the Winter Session from November 15 to December 15. - As all four statements appear factually correct according to historical accounts of the 1955 Committee's proposals, there is likely an issue with the provided options which only allow for a subset of these statements to be selected. However, if forced to choose based on a presumed single correct option among A, B, C, D, and given that B (2 and 3) is sometimes indicated as the correct answer in question sources, we focus on the correctness of 2 and 3. Statements 2 and 3 list the proposed dates for the two main sessions after the formation of the first Lok Sabha. 547. Consider the following statements: regarding lapsing of bills in the Parliament : 1. A Bill pending in the Parliament lapses by reason of the prorogation of the Houses. 2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha but not passed by Lok Sabha lapses when Lok Sabha dissolves. Which of the above statements is/are correct ?