The correct answer is: D. 1, 2 and 4 are true
Herbert A. Simon was an American political scientist, economist, and psychologist who won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1978. He is best known for his work on bounded rationality, which is the idea that people are limited in their ability to make rational decisions due to cognitive limitations.
Simon proposed a three-stage model of decision-making: intelligence, design, and choice. In the intelligence stage, the decision-maker identifies the problem that needs to be solved. In the design stage, the decision-maker develops alternative solutions to the problem. In the choice stage, the decision-maker selects the best solution from the alternatives.
Simon also proposed the satisficing model of decision-making. This model suggests that people make decisions by searching for a solution that is good enough, rather than trying to find the optimal solution.
Statements 1, 2, and 4 are all true about Herbert A. Simon's decision-making process. Statement 3 is false, as bounded rationality is a key concept in Simon's work.
Here is a more detailed explanation of each statement:
- Statement 1: Decision-making process involves intelligence, design and choice activities.
This statement is true because Simon's three-stage model of decision-making includes the intelligence, design, and choice stages.
- Statement 2: Decision-making involves choice between alternative plans of action.
This statement is true because in the design stage of Simon's model, the decision-maker develops alternative solutions to the problem.
- Statement 3: Bounded rationality has no significance in decision-making process.
This statement is false because bounded rationality is a key concept in Simon's work. Bounded rationality is the idea that people are limited in their ability to make rational decisions due to cognitive limitations.
- Statement 4: Satisficing model brings about a balance between individual and organisational value judgement in decision-making process.
This statement is true because the satisficing model suggests that people make decisions by searching for a solution that is good enough, rather than trying to find the optimal solution. This can be seen as a balance between individual and organizational value judgments, as it allows people to make decisions that are acceptable to both themselves and their organization.