While most pending business lapses upon dissolution of Lok Sabha, certain matters of a constitutional or quasi-judicial nature, like proceedings for the removal of a Judge, are exceptions and do not lapse. Privilege issues are generally related to the House in existence.
Which of the following statements is/are correct with regard to the effect of dissolution of Lok Sabha ? 1. Supplementary Demands for grants do not lapse. 2. A motion given in pursuance of Section 3(1) of Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 for presenting an address to the President praying for removal of a Judge, if admitted, will not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. 3. Anything said or done during the existence of a House, can be raised as a privilege issue after that House has been dissolved. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Asked in UPSC SO Steno 2017 · Topic: The Parliament (Sessions of Parliament: Summons, Prorogation, Adjournment, Dissolution)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Which of the following statements is/are correct with regard to Lok Sabha ? 1. The procedure for summoning of Lok Sabha for an emergency session is generally not same as for a regular session. 2. The assurances given by Ministers on the floor of the House, which are pending for implementation are deemed not to lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. 3. Business pending before parliamentary committees of the Lok Sabha do not lapse on dissolution of Lok Sabha. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
- Which one of the following statements is correct with regard to dissolution of the Lok Sabha?
- Which one of the following statements is not correct with regard to Lok Sabha ?
- 116.How many times at least has the Parliament to meet in a year :
- Which one of the following is authorized to prorogue the session of the house of the people?
- Consider the following statements: The Speaker of Lok Sabha has the power to adjourn the House sine die but, on prorogation, it is only the President who can summon the House. Unless sooner dissolved or there is an extension of the term, there is an automatic dissolution of the Lok Sabha by efflux of time, at the end of the period of five years, even if no formal order of dissolution is issued by the President. The Speaker of Lok Sabha continues in office even after the dissolution of the House and until ‘immediately before the first meeting of the House’. Which of the statements given above are correct?
- According to Article 85(1) of the Constitution of India, the Lok Sabha must meet at least how many times?
- What can be the maximum interval between two sessions of each House of the Parliament?