The Golak Nath judgment held that Fundamental Rights are transcendental and immutable, and therefore not subject to amendment by Parliament under Article 368.
Which one of the following judgments declared that the Parliament has NO power to amend any of the provisions of Part III of the Constitution of India ?
Asked in UPSC CAPF 2017 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Landmark Judgments and Doctrines)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy of the Chief Justice of India and the Collegium of Judges in the appointment and transfer of higher judiciary?
- In 2015, the Supreme Court of India struck down Section 66A of the Information and Technology Act, 2000 as being unconstitutional and violative of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. In which case did the Supreme Court deliver this landmark judgment ?
- In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directions that statutory status should be conferred upon the Central Vigilance Commission ?
- Who was the dissenting Judge in the Apex Court's Sabarimala verdict?
- The Supreme Court of India enunciated the doctrine of ‘Basic Structure of the Constitution’ in
- The status of women in Indian Society is glorified by a judgement of a Court in September, 2003. The Court is
- In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India enunciated the ‘doctrione of basic structure’ ?
- In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India declare the prevalence of Fundamental Rights over Directive Principles of the State Policy in case of conflict between the two ?