Article 14 (Equality before law), Article 19 (Freedom of speech and expression), and Article 21 (Right to life and personal liberty) are fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Various landmark cases have interpreted and upheld these rights. Article 29 pertains to the protection of minority interests.
Point out the mismatched pair :
Asked in Civil Judge (Junior Division) Exam 2013 · Topic: Fundamental Rights (Landmark Supreme Court Judgments related to Fundamental Rights)
Show answer
Answer: D. Bhim Singh V/s State of J & K (1986) - Article 29
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Assertion [A]: It is the duty of the government to ensure that the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution is not violated. Reason [R]: Supreme Court held that the right to life is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution and it includes the right to the enjoyment of pollution-free water and air for full enjoyment of life. Codes:
- In which case it was specified by the Supreme Court that the concept of natural justice and due process are an essential part of the constitution scheme guaranteeing fundamental rights ?
- In which of the following case, Supreme Court of India declared the Right of Equality, as a basic feature of the Constitution A) Onkar Lal Bajaj v. Union of India, A.I.R. 2003, S.C. 2562 B) Vishal Properties (P) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. 2007, S.C. 2924 C) Ashutosh Gupta v. State of Rajasthan A.I.R. 2002, S.C. 1533 D) M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, A.I.R. 2007, S.C. 1
- In which of the following case, Supreme Court of India declared the Right of Equality, as a basic feature of the Constitution
- Which of the following may be a violation of fundamental rights?
- The Indian Parliament has the power to modify the rights conferred by Part III of the Constitution of India in their application to __________. 1. The members of the Armed Forces 2. The members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order 3. Persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence 4. But there is no restriction on rights conferred by Part III, while martial law is in force in any area
- Which among the following actions would violate human rights? 1. State forces disrupting peaceful protests. 2. State forces carrying out search warrants in insurgency affected areas. 3. State forces engaging with armed insurgents in civilian areas resulting in loss of civilian lives. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- Barring exceptions, no law providing for preventive detention shall authorize the detention of a person for a period longer than