Comparing the tenures of the given options: - Rajendra Mal Lodha: Approximately 3 months (May 2014 - Aug 2014) - S. Rajendra Babu: Approximately 1 month (May 2004 - June 2004) - Gopal Ballav Pattanaik: Approximately 2 months (Oct 2002 - Dec 2002) - Kamal Narain Singh: 17 days (November 25, 1991 - December 12, 1991) Kamal Narain Singh holds the record for the shortest tenure as Chief Justice of India.
Who was the Chief Justice of India for the shortest duration?
Asked in CGPSC Prelims Exam 2021 · Topic: The Supreme Court (Landmark Judgments and Doctrines)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Landmark judgments and the findings by Hon'ble courts are mentioned below. Evaluate the pairs: 1. Minerva Mills v. Union of India: The power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution is limited by the Constitution. 2. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum: Extended Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code to provide maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman. 3. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India: The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act (IT Act), which violated freedom of speech and expression, declaring it to be unconstitutional. Which of the statements given above are correct?
- The Supreme Court of India has constituted a Committee of Administrators (COA) to run the BCCI. Who among the following is not a member of COA ?
- Which of the following statement(s) is(are) correct? 1. The judgment in First Judges Case declared that the Primacy of The CJI's recommendations to the President can be refused for cogent reasons. 2. The judgment in Second Judges Case declared that "justiciability" and "primacy" required that the CJI be given the "primal" role in such appointments. 3. The judgment in Three Judges Case ruled out the concept of "primacy" of the highest judiciary over the executive.
- The Supreme Court's I. R. Coelho Judgment (2007) is related to:
- I R Coelho judgment (2007) of the Supreme Court deals with :
- Consider the following statements regarding FASTER:
- The Doctrine of Fundamental Rights cannot be amended under Article 368 was propounded by the Supreme Court of India in
- Consider the following statements: Pravara v. Union of India Dwaraka Das v. Union of India Kesavananda Bharathi Ors v. Union of India N. Arunchalam (Dead) Anr. v. Union of India
