- Article 108, not 109, deals with the Joint Sitting of Parliament. - Joint Sittings are specifically excluded for Constitution Amendment Bills.
With reference to the 'Joint Sitting of Parliament', which of the following statements is/ are correct? 1. Article 109 of the Constitution of India provides for the Joint Sitting of Parliament. 2. A Joint Sitting of Parliament may be called to pass a Constitution Amendment Bill. Select the correct answer from the code given below : Code : (a) Both 1 and 2 (b) Only 2 (c) Neither 1 nor 2 (d) Only 1
Asked in uppsc 2025 2025 · Topic: The Parliament (Legislative Procedure: Types of Bills (Ordinary, Money, Financial, Constitution Amendment) and their passage)
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- What happens to a Bill that is pending in the Rajya Sabha and has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, when the Lok Sabha is dissolved ?
- Consider the following statements regarding Money Bill in the Parliament of India : I. It can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha. II. All financial bills are Money Bills. III. A Money Bill is defined in Article 110 of the Constitution of India. IV. Rajya Sabha has the power to amend a Money Bill. Select the correct answer using the codes given below :
- In case of differences between the two houses of the Parliament on an ordinary bill, the same is resolved by :
- Who is to certify that any bill is a Money Bill ?
- Read carefully the following sentences: I. In case of disagreement between both the houses of Indian Parliament there is a provision of joint sitting. II. A joint sitting can be called only on ordinary bills. III. A provision for joint sitting on Constitutional Amendment Bills is also described in Article 102. Which of the statements are correct -
- The Provision of a joint sitting of both the Houses of Parliament is mentioned in the Constitution under the following Article -
- Which of the following actions can be taken by the Rajya Sabha regarding Money Bill?
- Identify the incorrectly matched pair :