- Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 specifically deals with the necessity of obtaining prior sanction from the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, before prosecuting a public servant for offences punishable under Sections 7, 11, 13 and 15 of the Act. - This provision is a safeguard for public servants against vexatious prosecution, ensuring that the decision to prosecute is taken by a competent authority after due consideration.
To prosecute a public servant, prior sanction from the Central or State Government is necessary. The provision for previous sanction necessary for prosecution of public servant for offences punishable under Sections 7, 11, 13 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act is mentioned under which one of the following Sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ?
Asked in UPSC CISF AC EXE 2022 · Topic: The Parliamentary Act (Powers and Functions of Parliament (Legislative, Executive, Financial, Constituent))
More Indian Polity and Governance questions
- Which of the following Sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 makes provision regarding Appeals and Revision to the High Court ?
- Which of the following Acts is/are not applicable to Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) ? 1. The Payment of Wages Act, 1936 2. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 3. The Indian Penal Code, 1860 4. The Factories Act, 1948 Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- Which one of the following pairs is not correctly matched, as per the Central Industrial Security Force Amendment Act, 1983 ?
- For the purpose of inquiring into any offences or trying offences specified under Section 18(1) of the Central Industrial Security Force Act, every officer holding the rank of Commandant or equivalent, shall exercise the powers of a:
- Which one of the following is not covered under minor penalties imposed on a Government servant ?
- The question whether the Central Administrative Tribunal could interfere with penalty awarded by the competent authority on the ground that it is excessive or disproportionate to the misconduct proved, was examined by the Supreme Court of India in which one of the following cases ?
- Which one of the following is not included in the Human Resource Policy of CISF ?
- Which one of the following may not be awarded as punishment by the supervisory officer to any enrolled member of the CISF who discharges his duties in a careless or negligent manner ?